SKU: 88279617425

Diode Dynamics 194 LED Bulb HP3 LED - Blue (Single)

Sale price$9.00 Regular price$10.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $2.50 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 16 - Jul 21

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Diode Dynamics 194 LED Bulb HP3 LED - Blue (Single)194 HP3 LED Features Diffused lens design for even spread Proven performance highly reliable Increased output with LED Appearance Plug and play simple installation Overview Design. The 194 HP3 LED bulb is a compact simple LED replacement with proven performance. The single diffused optic spreads light in the original lamp for OEM style appearance and function. With its dual lead contacts it will fit snugly in the socket and its light weight means it

194 HP3 LED Features Diffused lens design for even spread Proven performance highly reliable Increased output with LED Appearance Plug and play simple installation Overview Design. The 194 HP3 LED bulb is a compact simple LED replacement with proven performance. The single diffused optic spreads light in the original lamp for OEM-style appearance and function. With its dual-lead contacts it will fit snugly in the socket and its light weight means it won't vibrate loose over time. Reliability. Unlike other bulbs on the market this bulb is built with constant-current circuitry along with transient suppression. That means this bulb will last for years not months with no flickering or failure. And like every Diode Dynamics product it's backed by an industry-leading three-year replacement warranty. Brightness. With 56 lumens of true measured output the HP3 LED will provide about double the total light compared to your original 5W 194 or 168 sized bulb. Its even spread in the housing makes for a good amount of useful light whether mounted in a straight or side-plug orientation. Colors. In addition to vibrant colors of blue red amber and green the 194 HP3 is available in a number of white color options. These include a cool white 6000K warm white 3000K a 5000K or pure white and a 4000K or natural white. Whether you want a modern cool white appearance or a traditional warm white color with more output we have the color to fit your need!

  • Molded construction with sturdy double terminals
  • Direct replacement for your factory bulb
  • Increased output with LED Appearance
  • Plug and play simple installation

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
2002-2003 Acura CL Base
2001 Acura CL Premium
2001-2003 Acura CL Type-S
2013-2022 Acura ILX Base
2013-2014 Acura ILX Hybrid
2007-2018 Acura RDX Base
2010-2012 Acura RDX SH-AWD
2005-2012 Acura RL Base
2014-2020 Acura RLX Base
2014,2016-2020 Acura RLX Sport Hybrid SH-AWD
2002-2006 Acura RSX Base
2002-2006 Acura RSX Type-S
1999-2008 Acura TL Base
2002-2003,2007-2008 Acura TL Type-S
2004-2014 Acura TSX Base
2012-2014 Acura TSX Special Edition
2010-2014 Acura TSX V6
2006-2013 Audi A3 Base
2015-2019 Audi A3 Premium
2015-2019 Audi A3 Premium Plus
2015-2019 Audi A3 Prestige
2010-2013 Audi A3 TDI
2015-2016 Audi A3 TDI Premium
2015-2016 Audi A3 TDI Premium Plus
2015-2016 Audi A3 TDI Prestige
2019 Audi A3 Titanium
2003-2006,2009-2014 Audi A4 Base
2003-2006,2009 Audi A4 Cabriolet
2015-2016 Audi A4 Premium
2015-2016 Audi A4 Premium Plus
2015 Audi A4 Prestige
2010-2014 Audi A5 Cabriolet
2006-2011 Audi A6 Base
2012-2016 Audi A6 Premium
2012-2016 Audi A6 Premium Plus
2013-2016 Audi allroad Premium
2013-2016 Audi allroad Premium Plus
2013-2015 Audi allroad Prestige
2017-2018 Audi Q3 Premium
2015-2018 Audi Q3 Premium Plus
2015-2017 Audi Q3 Prestige
2013-2016 Audi Q5 Hybrid Prestige
2009-2018 Audi Q5 Premium
2009-2018 Audi Q5 Premium Plus
2009-2018 Audi Q5 Prestige
2014-2016 Audi Q5 TDI Premium Plus
2016 Audi Q5 TDI Premium Plus S-Line
2014-2016 Audi Q5 TDI Prestige
2016 Audi Q5 TDI Prestige S-Line
2007-2010 Audi Q7 Base
2007-2015 Audi Q7 Premium
2011-2015 Audi Q7 Premium Plus
2010-2015 Audi Q7 Prestige
2009-2010 Audi Q7 TDI
2011-2015 Audi Q7 TDI Premium
2011-2015 Audi Q7 TDI Premium Plus
2011-2015 Audi Q7 TDI Prestige
2008-2012 Audi R8 Base
2012 Audi R8 GT
2012 Audi R8 GT Spyder
2011-2012 Audi R8 Spyder
2018-2019 Audi RS3 Base
2007-2008 Audi RS4 Base
2008 Audi RS4 Cabriolet
2013-2015 Audi RS5 Base
2014-2015 Audi RS5 Cabriolet
2014-2015 Audi RS7 Base
2015-2019 Audi S3 Premium Plus
2015-2019 Audi S3 Prestige
2002,2004-2006 Audi S4 Avant
2002,2004-2006,2010-2013 Audi S4 Base
2004-2006,2009 Audi S4 Cabriolet
2014-2016 Audi S4 Premium Plus
2014-2016 Audi S4 Prestige
2008-2013,2017 Audi S5 Base
2010-2013 Audi S5 Cabriolet
2014-2016,2018 Audi S5 Premium Plus
2014-2016,2018 Audi S5 Prestige
2007-2011,2013-2015 Audi S6 Base
2016 Audi S6 Premium Plus
2016 Audi S6 Prestige
2013-2016 Audi S7 Base
2007-2009,2013 Audi S8 Base
2014-2018 Audi SQ5 Premium Plus
2014-2018 Audi SQ5 Prestige
2000-2006,2008-2009 Audi TT Base
2012-2017 BMW 535i GT Base
2012-2017 BMW 535i GT xDrive Base
2012-2015 BMW 550i GT Base
2012-2017 BMW 550i GT xDrive Base
2014-2021 BMW i3 Base
2014-2021 BMW i3 Range Extender
2018-2019 BMW M4 Base
2019 BMW M4 CS
2018-2019 BMW X3 M40i
2015-2017 BMW X3 sDrive28i
2019 BMW X3 sDrive30i
2015-2017 BMW X3 xDrive28d
2011-2017 BMW X3 xDrive28i
2018-2019 BMW X3 xDrive30i
2011-2017 BMW X3 xDrive35i
2016-2018 BMW X4 M40i
2015-2018 BMW X4 xDrive28i
2015-2016 BMW X4 xDrive35i
2001-2006 BMW X5 3.0i
2007-2008 BMW X5 3.0si
2000-2006 BMW X5 4.4i
2002-2003 BMW X5 4.6is
2007-2008 BMW X5 4.8i
2004-2006 BMW X5 4.8is
2010-2013,2015-2018,2020-2021 BMW X5 M
2020 BMW X5 M Competition
2020-2021 BMW X5 M50i
2014-2018 BMW X5 sDrive35i
2020-2021 BMW X5 sDrive40i
2009-2010 BMW X5 xDrive30i
2009-2018 BMW X5 xDrive35d
2011-2018 BMW X5 xDrive35i
2016-2018 BMW X5 xDrive40e
2019-2021 BMW X5 xDrive40i
2021 BMW X5 xDrive45e
2009-2010 BMW X5 xDrive48i
2011-2020 BMW X5 xDrive50i
2010-2011 BMW X6 ActiveHybrid
2010-2018 BMW X6 M
2015-2018 BMW X6 sDrive35i
2008-2018 BMW X6 xDrive35i
2008-2018 BMW X6 xDrive50i
2012-2016 BMW Z4 sDrive28i
2009-2011 BMW Z4 sDrive30i
2009-2016 BMW Z4 sDrive35i
2011-2016 BMW Z4 sDrive35is
2000-2005 Buick Century Custom
2000-2002,2004-2005 Buick Century Limited
2005 Buick Century Special Edition
2012 Buick Enclave Base
2008-2011 Buick Enclave CX
2008-2011 Buick Enclave CXL
2012-2016 Buick LaCrosse Base
2012 Buick LaCrosse Convenience
2005-2011 Buick LaCrosse CX
2005-2011 Buick LaCrosse CXL
2005-2008,2010-2011 Buick LaCrosse CXS
2012-2016 Buick LaCrosse Leather
2012-2016 Buick LaCrosse Premium
2016 Buick LaCrosse Sport Touring
2008-2009 Buick LaCrosse Super
2012-2013 Buick LaCrosse Touring
2000-2005 Buick LeSabre Custom
2000-2005 Buick LeSabre Limited
2006-2011 Buick Lucerne CX
2006-2011 Buick Lucerne CXL
2010 Buick Lucerne CXL Special Edition
2006-2008 Buick Lucerne CXS
2008-2011 Buick Lucerne Super
2000-2005 Buick Park Avenue Base
2000-2005 Buick Park Avenue Ultra
2004-2007 Buick Rainier CXL
2004-2005 Buick Rainier CXL Plus
2000-2004 Buick Regal GS
2000 Buick Regal GSE
2000-2004 Buick Regal LS
2000 Buick Regal LSE
2002-2007 Buick Rendezvous CX
2002-2003,2005 Buick Rendezvous CX Plus
2002-2007 Buick Rendezvous CXL
2002-2003,2005 Buick Rendezvous CXL Plus
2004-2005 Buick Rendezvous Ultra
2013-2019 Cadillac ATS Base
2013-2019 Cadillac ATS Luxury
2013-2016 Cadillac ATS Performance
2013-2016 Cadillac ATS Premium
2017-2019 Cadillac ATS Premium Luxury
2017-2019 Cadillac ATS Premium Performance
2016-2019 Cadillac ATS V
2002,2007-2013 Cadillac Escalade Base
2009-2013 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid
2010-2013 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid Platinum
2011-2013 Cadillac Escalade Luxury
2008-2013 Cadillac Escalade Platinum
2011-2013 Cadillac Escalade Premium
2004-2008 Cadillac XLR Base
2008-2009 Cadillac XLR Platinum
2006-2009 Cadillac XLR V
2013-2016 Cadillac XTS Base
2013-2016 Cadillac XTS Livery
2013-2016 Cadillac XTS Luxury
2013-2016 Cadillac XTS Platinum
2013-2016 Cadillac XTS Premium
2014-2016 Cadillac XTS Vsport Platinum
2014-2016 Cadillac XTS Vsport Premium
2010-2015,2017-2021 Chevrolet Camaro LS
2010-2021 Chevrolet Camaro LT
2020-2021 Chevrolet Camaro LT1
2010-2021 Chevrolet Camaro SS
2014-2015 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
2012-2015,2017-2021 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
1995-2005 Chevrolet Cavalier Base
1995-2005 Chevrolet Cavalier LS
2002-2005 Chevrolet Cavalier LS Sport
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 88279617425

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 15 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
S.B.
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Great, easy to understand explanations
Format: Kindle
I definitely needed this! I have been enduring a long period of spiritual attacks in the natural and physical realms. It has helped me to better understand my calling, even though I have been serving God as a spirit filled and spirit baptized follower of Yeshua.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
Trader Dave
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Easy to read. Line spacing is just right! Thank you!
Format: Paperback
Michael Van Vlymen delivers the lived from experience truth once again! Michael is down to earth and matter of fact as he writes. He is heavenly minded every day! I've grown more in love with Jesus because of his testimony of heavenly realms operating on the earthly realm. My eyes have been opened much much more as I listen and read Mikes well illustrated books and videos!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2025
O
Verified Purchase
Online shopper
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Challenge Accepted
Format: Kindle
I liked the book. It challenged my position of focusing on the light and ignoring the darkness. It challenges me to desire the whole experience of spiritual awareness and sight and to become adept in living as a watchman.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
Tim Chaffey
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Outstanding, compelling, and thorough work on the historicity or non-historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus
Format: Paperback
I had been looking forward to reading this book since the first time I heard about it. I was sitting in Dr. Gary Habermas' class on miracles and he told us about Mike Licona, who was currently working on his dissertation on the Resurrection. Although it was published in 2010, I finally had the opportunity to read it over the past few months. At over 700 pages, including an extensive bibliography and over 2,000 footnotes, this book is not a light read by any stretch of the imagination. As the subtitle states, this is a book dealing with historiography. Readers looking for a deep theological treatment on the Resurrection of Christ may want to look elsewhere since Licona's focus here is not theology, but history (although there is still a good deal of theology). Using methodological principles agreed upon by a vast number of historians from a variety of religious and philosophical backgrounds, he sets out to determine whether or not the historian "is warranted in regarding Jesus' resurrection as an event that occurred in the past" (p. 610). Surprisingly, the book consists of only five chapters and one appendix, so each chapter averages more than 100 pages in length. Also, the second half of the book contains a significant amount of Greek, giving me a good opportunity to brush up on that. If you can't read Greek, don't worry, Dr. Licona provides an English translation throughout. The first section deals with a significant number of preliminary considerations. There is an excellent critique of the skeptical postmodern view of history and a complete dismantling of the beliefs of Jesus "mythers" (those who claim Jesus never existed). There's also a good discussion on horizons (the presuppositions and biases we all have). While total neutrality may not be possible, Licona gives several principles historians should implement to help them transcend their horizon. Finally, he provides an honest discussion of his own biases so that readers are well aware of where he is coming from. The second chapter focuses on whether or not miracles fall within the purview of the historian. Licona addresses the popular objections of David Hume and Bart Ehrman, as well as McCullagh, Meier, Wedderburn, and Dunn. Many skeptics simply have an a priori objection to miracles, so they aren't willing to even consider the possibility that historical evidence for a miracle may exist. There's an interesting discussion on the burden of proof as it relates to the historicity of miracle claims. I thought the following quote summarized the nature of evidence when it comes to miracle claims: "It is the responsibility of the historian to consider what the evidence would look like if she were not wearing her metaphysical bias like a pair of sunglasses that shade the world. It is not the responsibility of the evidence to shine so brightly that they render such glasses ineffectual." (p. 196) With all the preliminary matters out of the way, Dr. Licona gets down to the business of doing history. Chapter three examines the historical sources pertaining to Christ's Resurrection. Many Christians may object to the methodology employed in this chapter since he does not automatically accept every biblical passage on the subject as evidence, but bear in mind that Licona is doing his best to transcend his own Christian horizon to be as neutral as possible. He discusses over two dozen early sources and rates them as "unlikely, possible-minus, possible, possible-plus, highly probable, indeterminate [or] not useful" (p. 201). The fourth chapter uncovers the historical bedrock pertaining to the fate of Jesus. This approach follows on the heels of the exhaustive work of Dr. Habermas who, since 1975, has kept track of over 3,400 academic works from scholars of various stripes on the Resurrection in English, German, and French. From this research, Dr. Habermas has shown that there are 12 facts accepted by the vast majority of scholars. He has reduced this to six best attested details in what he calls the "minimal facts" approach. Each of these facts are discussed, but Dr. Licona narrows this down to three facts that nearly all scholars agree upon: 1) Jesus died by crucifixion, 2) the disciples had experiences that led them to believe and proclaim that Jesus had risen from the dead, and 3) Paul converted to Christianity after experiencing what he believed to be a post-Resurrection appearance of Jesus. There's also a lengthy discussion on what "resurrection" meant to Jewish and Christian audiences in the first century. The information contained in this chapter is often completely ignored by agnostics, atheists, Muslims, and others who do not want to even consider the Resurrection as a possibility. I have had many discussions with skeptics who display naivete when they claim that there is no evidence to support the claim that Jesus rose from the dead. It's one thing to disbelieve in the event, but it's an entirely different thing to completely ignore or to willingly remain ignorant of the historical bedrock pertaining to the fate of Jesus. The fifth and final chapter of the book examines six different hypotheses that attempt to explain what happened to Jesus after being crucified. Along with the traditional Christian understanding of the Resurrection, the views promoted by Vermes, Goulder, Ludemann, Crossen, and Craffert are weighed in terms of their explanatory scope, explanatory power, plausibility, the amount of ad hoc elements, and illumination for solving problems associated with the subject. An appendix also examines Dale Allison's work on the Resurrection according to the same criteria. The traditional Resurrection hypothesis is the only view that fulfills all five criteria, and it outdistances the other views by a wide margin. Critics can claim that Licona merely concluded what he hoped to prove, but they must be able to point out flaws in his methodology, since his conclusion most certainly follows from the data when historiographical principles are applied. My biggest concern with the book is found in the fifth chapter. While discussing the strange events described in Matthew 27:51-53, Licona suggested that the passage was not describing historical events but employing apocalyptic language to show that a significant person had died. Such descriptions were not uncommon in the ancient world when describing the death of important people. This comment has set off a wave of criticism from conservative Christian scholars like Norman Geisler and Al Mohler. I disagree with Licona's statement and share some of the same concerns as Geisler and Mohler. But when I consider the context and methodology being used in the book, I don't find it to be quite as grievous an error as some have claimed. Skeptics will undoubtedly continue to dismiss the Resurrection of Christ, but they must deal with the research in this book or they simply are not interacting with the latest scholarship. Dr. Licona's work raises the bar when it comes to the most important subject we could ever study: the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. I highly recommend it for anyone interested in this subject who is up to the task of reading an academic work. I have studied the subject for years, but I still learned a lot and will treasure this book as an extremely valuable resource. Even though I disagree with his take on Matt. 27:51-53, I still need to give the book five stars since I don't need to agree with the author on every point for me to give a positive review and recognize the book's worth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2012
B
Verified Purchase
Brant Jones
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Brilliant, rigorous, balanced, and approachable
Format: Paperback
"The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach," by Michael R. Licona is an outstanding, thorough yet highly approachable assessment of the evidence, sources, and explanatory hypotheses for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. As the subtitle suggests, it borrows significant methodological rigor and best practices from the field of historical analysis and applies them to biblical scholarship. Licona begins his assessment with a meticulous discussion of his historical analysis methodology. Included in this section is his definition of five criteria he uses to assess a set of explanatory hypotheses. He then uses those assessments to weigh the hypotheses based on nine levels of certainty ranging from “certainly not historical” to “certainly historical.” The hypothesis representing the best explanation for the resurrection of Christ is the one rated highest in historical certainty based on the five criteria. At the outset of the book, Licona also includes a robust discussion of historical analysis influences and issues because evaluating them openly is essential to his methodical approach and because they aren’t often discussed in biblical studies. It is in this section that he does something quite unique and insightful; Licona includes a full discussion of knowledge, experiences, worldviews, preferences and other influences, which he calls “horizons,” that tend to bias the assessment of history. Furthermore, he defines a set of six methods that he uses throughout the book to avoid his own biases as he strives to present outcomes based on methodical neutrality. It’s quite brilliant. Licona even includes a confession of his own “horizons” - his potential influences. With all this foundation in place, Licona proceeds to identify all sources of evidence for the resurrection of Christ and rates each according to its likelihood of providing reliable independent testimony. Included in this assessment are sources from the Bible, early Christian writers, non-biblical Christian literature and early non-Christian writers. He then uses the most reliable sources as the basis for attesting to the reliability for all the available evidence for the resurrection. This produces three pieces of evidence that he calls “historical bedrock” because they are well attested within multiple reliable sources and are validated by a broad range of scholars. In the final section of the book, Licona evaluates major assertions against the resurrection from skeptics and compares the results against a parallel evaluation of the resurrection hypothesis. Specifically, he uses his criteria and rating system to assess how well hypotheses from a range of skeptical scholars, like Gerd Ludemann and John Dominic Crossan, are able to explain the historical bedrock evidence. At the end of this extensive analysis, the biblical resurrection hypothesis is by far the most credible explanation for historical bedrock evidence associated with the resurrection of Jesus Christ. As noted above, Michael Licona’s book is an excellent assessment of the evidence, sources and competing hypotheses associated with the resurrection of Christ. The author uniquely applies the meticulousness of best practice historical analysis methodology to arguably the most important of all biblical questions. Using rigorous criteria and rating scales, Licona delivers a fair and balanced evaluation that achieves the methodical neutrality he was striving for while minimizing, as best as possible, influences from his “horizons.” It’s also worth noting that Licona assesses a broad range of possible sources, including those classified as gnostic and pseudepigraphal, and includes viewpoints from a broad range of scholars, supportive and skeptical alike. Furthermore, the author includes a very robust set of footnotes on the various topics discussed within the book. These footnotes are helpful for both scholars and non-scholars looking for a deeper understanding or pointers for additional exploration plus they include additional explanatory comments that complement Licona’s focus on delivering a fair and balanced assessment. The one issue I found while reading the book was its treatment of the empty tomb evidence. I was disappointed the author’s discussion was brief since I was looking forward to a robust evaluation. However, in his defense, Licona was looking for historical bedrock evidence that could be used to assess the various resurrection hypotheses. A large number of scholars are skeptical of the empty tomb so it doesn’t belong in his historical bedrock category. Beside this one brief moment of disappointment, I was greatly pleased with the totality of Licona’s analysis and outcomes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2021

recommand products