
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
21319 e1 xl k tvpb fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Abdichtung: beidseitig Befestigungshlse: AHX319 Auendurchmesser: 200 mm Freiraumueres Breitenmae: B a min 7 mm Minimale fr Hlse Bezugsdrehzahl: 3. 250 1 min Gewicht: 6630 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 4. 600 1 min Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmiernutueres Breitenma: 9,5 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 200,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 45,00 E1 Increased Capacity Design
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Abdichtung: beidseitig |
| Befestigungshülse: AHX319 |
| Außendurchmesser: 200 mm |
| FreiraumÄußeres Breitenmaße: B a min 7 mm Minimale für Hülse |
| Bezugsdrehzahl: 3.250 1/min |
| Gewicht: 6630 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 4.600 1/min |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaß: 9,5 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 200,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 45,00 |
| E1 Increased Capacity Design |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 6.63 |
| Innenmaße: mm 95,00 |
| Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft |
| Schwingsiebausführung Keine Schwingsiebausführung |
| TVPB Solid Window Cage Made From Glass Fibre Reinforced Polyamide, Guidance On Inner Ring |
| AHX319 Befestigungshülse |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 120 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 450.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 425.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 48.500 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| D 200 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Durchmesser Schmierkanal: 4,8 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 425.000 N |
| Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 3,04 |
| Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 4,53 |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 48.500 N |
| Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y: 0,22 |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 2,5 mm |
| Minimale FreiraumÄußeres Breitenmaß für Hülse: 7 mm |
| Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 109 mm |
| Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse: 102 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 3 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 450.000 N |
| Statischer Axiallastfaktor: 2,97 |
| T max 120 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Y 0 2,97 Statischer Axiallastfaktor |
| Y 1 3,04 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor |
| Y 2 4,53 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor |
| d =a min 109 mm Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =b min 102 mm Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse |
| d =s 4,8 mm Durchmesser Schmierkanal |
| e 0,22 Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y |
| n G 4.600 1/min Grenzdrehzahl |
| n s 9,5 mm SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaße: |
| n ϑr 3.250 1/min Bezugsdrehzahl |
| r a max 2,5 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 3 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 6,414 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 2203 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Nice replacement to poof or wash clothes
These are nice. Affordable enough to try without risking much. I was pleasantly surprised.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Better than loofahs
Bought these for my husband and he loves them! Regular loofahs fall apart to quickly and don’t give him the right amount of exfoliation he is looking for as these ones do.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 31, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Good but...
Is it worth the price? Not really. Nothing special.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 31, 2023
★★★★★ 4
Round scrubbers are better but these will do
These are great for making my skin feel clean and smooth. I do find that these rectangular ones feel a bit less firm and the padding inside gets scrunched up on the first use. It kind of makes it feel like an old pillow. Still, even with that, you do get a nice scrub with lots of bubbles. Cleanlogic are my favorite bath accessory.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 26, 2022
★★★★★ 5
My favorite!
I’ve been using the Cleanlogic Detoxify Purifying Charcoal Infused Body Scrubber for a while now and it’s honestly my favorite shower loufa. It scrubs really well, helps get all the dirt off, and leaves you feeling super clean after every shower. It’s durable and holds up great over time. Highly recommend!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2026