SKU: 75531701185

Vierkante houten plantenbak met poten 45 x 45 x 47 cm

Sale price$134.07 Regular price$148.97
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 11 - Jul 16

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Vierkante houten plantenbak met poten 45 x 45 x 47 cmBen je op zoek naar een compacte en stijlvolle manier om je tuin te verfraaien? Deze vierkante houten plantenbak met poten is de perfecte oplossing voor iedereen die zijn buitenruimte wil verrijken met een prachtig, duurzaam tuinaccessoire. Met zijn afmetingen van 45 x 45 x 47 cm is deze plantenbak ideaal voor het creren van een charmante tuinhoek, of je nu bloemen, kruiden of kleine bomen wilt planten. Het geschaafde teak en het onbehandelde hout

Ben je op zoek naar een compacte en stijlvolle manier om je tuin te verfraaien? Deze vierkante houten plantenbak met poten is de perfecte oplossing voor iedereen die zijn buitenruimte wil verrijken met een prachtig, duurzaam tuinaccessoire. Met zijn afmetingen van 45 x 45 x 47 cm is deze plantenbak ideaal voor het creëren van een charmante tuinhoek, of je nu bloemen, kruiden of kleine bomen wilt planten. Het geschaafde teak en het onbehandelde hout geven de plantenbak een tijdloze uitstraling die na verloop van tijd alleen maar mooier wordt.

Een elegante toevoeging aan je tuin

Deze vierkante houten plantenbak met poten biedt niet alleen ruimte voor je planten, maar voegt ook een natuurlijke, verfijnde uitstraling toe aan je buitenruimte. Het hoogwaardige teak dat is gebruikt in de constructie zorgt voor een lange levensduur en is bestand tegen alle weersomstandigheden. Deze plantenbak is perfect voor iedereen die op zoek is naar een praktische, maar stijlvolle oplossing om zijn tuin of terras te verfraaien.

Waarom kiezen voor deze vierkante houten plantenbak met poten?

Deze plantenbak is de ideale keuze voor tuinliefhebbers die zowel functionaliteit als esthetiek willen combineren. Hier zijn enkele redenen waarom deze plantenbak de perfecte keuze is:

  • Duurzaam teak: Het gebruik van teak, afkomstig uit Indonesië, zorgt ervoor dat de plantenbak sterk en bestand is tegen de elementen. Teakhout is van nature rot- en waterbestendig, wat betekent dat je jarenlang van je plantenbak kunt genieten zonder dat het hout snel beschadigt.
  • Onbehandeld hout: De onbehandelde afwerking geeft de plantenbak een natuurlijke uitstraling. Het hout zal na verloop van tijd een mooie grijze patina ontwikkelen, wat bijdraagt aan de charme van de bak en een rustieke uitstraling biedt.
  • Compact formaat: Met de afmetingen van 45 cm in lengte, 45 cm in breedte en 47 cm in hoogte is deze plantenbak ideaal voor kleinere tuinen, terrassen of balkons. Het compacte ontwerp maakt het gemakkelijk om de bak overal in je buitenruimte te plaatsen.
  • Verantwoord houtgebruik: De plantenbak is gemaakt van 'Indonesian legal wood', wat betekent dat het hout afkomstig is van verantwoord beheerde bossen. Dit maakt de Tuindeco Lombok niet alleen een mooie, maar ook een milieuvriendelijke keuze.
  • Gewicht: Met een gewicht van 10 kg is deze plantenbak stevig en stabiel, maar nog steeds makkelijk te verplaatsen wanneer dat nodig is.

Onderhoudstips voor langdurig gebruik

De Vierkante houten plantenbak met poten is ontworpen om lang mee te gaan, maar met een beetje onderhoud kun je ervoor zorgen dat hij er altijd prachtig uitziet. Omdat het hout onbehandeld is, zal het na verloop van tijd een mooie grijze patina ontwikkelen die het hout een charmante en verouderde uitstraling geeft. Als je liever de originele kleur behoudt, kun je de bak behandelen met een geschikte houtolie of beits die speciaal bedoeld is voor teak. Dit helpt niet alleen de kleur te behouden, maar beschermt ook tegen invloeden van het weer.

De perfecte keuze voor iedere tuin

Of je nu een klein terras hebt of een groot tuinontwerp wilt aanvullen, deze vierkante houten plantenbak met poten past perfect in elke ruimte. Het biedt voldoende ruimte voor je favoriete planten en is tegelijkertijd een aantrekkelijke en functionele toevoeging aan je buitenruimte. Gebruik de Lombok om kleurrijke bloemen of geurige kruiden in je tuin te plaatsen, of creëer een mooie groene oase met kleine bomen of struiken.

Een duurzame en mooie investering voor je tuin

De Vierkante houten plantenbak met poten is niet alleen een praktische keuze voor je tuin, maar ook een investering in de uitstraling van je buitenruimte. Het hoogwaardige teak en de eenvoudige, tijdloze uitstraling zorgen ervoor dat deze plantenbak jarenlang meegaat en altijd in harmonie blijft met je tuinontwerp. Maak van je buitenruimte een plek om van te genieten met de Vierkante houten plantenbak met poten, de ideale plantenbak voor iedere tuinliefhebber.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 75531701185

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 2470 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
W
Verified Purchase
WellBCare
Houston, US
★★★★★ 2
Be clear that it's a blank journal you create, with brief quotes and thumbnail art
Format: Paperback
If one is looking for a personal journal of empty lined pages ~ and a brief Lilias Trotter quote with a thumbnail-size photo of her art on each page then this is for you. I understood it was a book of her journalling with more viewable-size sketches.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2022
E
Verified Purchase
Eric Balkan
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
When and where economics went wrong
Format: Paperback
This is one of those books that can provide an epiphany to the reader -- but not very many American readers have even heard of it, unfortunately. That could be due to it's being a book primarily about English economic history, with assumptions that the reader is familiar to some extent with things like the Poor Laws and Tory socialism. But I wasn't, and was still able to glean some great insights from the work. That could be because Polanyi is not afraid of repetition. :-) A key insight, and the one that could be summed up as the theme of the book, is Polanyi's realization that prior to about 1830, the market and the economy were considered part of society. That is, economic activity was something that people did along with everything else they did, like engage in social/familial relationships, religious rituals, etc. But with the 1830s came a paradigm shift: the advent of rational capitalism. Now, the market was considered an entity by itself, outside of society. This market entity was viewed as governed by universal laws. Like laws of physics, these market laws were independent of culture, independent of social group, independent of time period, and, in fact, independent of human behavior. While any observer of human nature would say that people often make decisions for emotional reasons -- and modern neurological research shows that virtually every decision we make is a combination of the rational and the emotional -- these market laws assumed only rational behavior on the part of economic actors. Though Polanyi doesn't mention it, it's now easy to see how Alfred Marshall could get carried away with creating a mathematical foundation for microeconomics and how Leon Walras could, reportedly, say that if something couldn't be studied mathematically, it wasn't worth studying. There's no current way to model emotions with math, and so the Ricardian prototype of an emotion-less economics continues into the modern economics of today. These universal market laws frees the market from any social constraints. A number of modern neo-classical economists assert that this makes economics purely amoral, i.e., without regard for any ethics. Therefore any attempts by the public, by politicians, or by workers to add ethics to the market is an interference with pure market workings, which, according to their interpretation of Adam Smith's "invisible hand", will produce optimal results if just left alone. But Smith never said that, and in fact rational capitalism, in elevating greed and selfishness to the status of goals -- see the Ayn Rand work "The Virtue Of Selfishness" -- is, IMO, not amoral at all, but rather is a morality of its own. Anyway, back to Polanyi's insights. Another key one is the concept of a "double movement" in 19th century England. Each move to create a purer market created an ad-hoc counter move. E.g., Ricardian free trade was faced with opposition from workers losing their jobs and local firms losing business Americans can easily think of another example: where the employment of children (eventually) led to laws restricting that employment, simply because human beings have too much of a sympathetic nature to sit still for children losing limbs in the dangerous factories and mines of the time. Polanyi notes that capitalists often blame these anti-capitalist laws on planned activity by socialist anti-market groups, but he says they're actually the result of the recognition by the general public that they don't want to live under a pure market system. Yet another good insight is Polanyi's recognition that market laws treat labor, land, and money as commodities. We can see that today, where neo-classical economists assert that the law of supply and demand should apply to workers as it applies to anything else in the economy. That is, if there's a surplus of workers in one area and a shortage in another, supply and demand dictates the flow of workers from the one area to the other. But a laid-off textile worker in South Carolina is not going to move to China for a job. That's my own example, but Polanyi offers his own from modern English history. The book isn't perfect. Polanyi does have a tendency to generalize, a common failing among authors, IMO. E.g., in discussing the rise of fascism in the 1930s, he's on very shaky ground when he starts talking about the US or about Russian policy intentions during that period. I gave The Great Transformation 5 stars because, even with its faults, the reader will be thinking about Polanyi's insights for some time to come. I am.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2009
K
Verified Purchase
Kindle Customer
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Not light reading but worth it
Format: Kindle
Much of this book was heavy reading for me, mainly due my not being familiar with the background development and history of various economic theory and associated laws over 500 or so years of British history. I did stick it out and am glad I did. There are many insights as to how we have arrived at today and the book is still relevant even though it was written in 1942. I found the last few chapters and the comments in Sources to offer the most explanations to fit modern times especially with regard to the rise of fascism. Thick but worth it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2025
B
Verified Purchase
Blake West
Houston, US
★★★★★ 4
Interesting anthropology and critique, but dense and obtuse writing
Format: Kindle
The good part is that at the end of the day, I learned a lot here, and Polanyi raised a lot of very interesting and under-discussed historical points to create his argument. It felt very similar to David Graeber (or I guess Graeber is similar to Polanyi) in that way. The bad part is that, whereas Graeber writes with exceptional clarity and vividness, Polanyi is obtuse and dense. And I've read other books from this era, I don't think it's the time. I think it's Polanyi's writing. Beyond that, his work serves more as analysis than prescription. It's a bit unclear exactly what he's advocating for. Which maybe is OK, though I prefer when non fiction writers offer solutions rather than just pointing out problems. All in all, if you can settle in with his writing, there are definite gems in there.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Kitty Bryant
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Inspiring analysis of economic history
Format: Paperback
Polanyi presents economic history through an analysis of the "utopian" catastrophy of the self-regulating market economy. Polanyi argues that the free market economy treats the most essential elements of human society - labor, nature, and money - as if they should be exploited like commodities. When liberalism (free marketeerism) rules, then the economy dictates what is possible in human society, and these rules are intolerable because they create conditions under which humans are impoverished and disempowered. In his final chapter he lays out the battle ground between liberalism and its alternatives, which when he was writing (1945) were socialism and fascism. Fascism refuses the dictates of economic liberalism but substitutes in its place the dictates of a state that denies individual freedom. Socialism, alternatively, holds the only promise of true freedom for the individual where economic and political rules are developed and enforced democratically for the protection of society. While this is not an easy read because it demands a background in history, he is a fluent and persuasive writer.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2023

recommand products